Powerfeedback by Scott

My name is Scott Gingold and I am the CEO of Powerfeedback . I do my best to keep followers informed, encouraged and amused.

To E-Mail Me

Subscribe in a reader

View Scott Gingold's profile on LinkedIn

Scott Gingold's Facebook profile

Add to Technorati Favorites

Digg!

Some Links Worth Checking Out

Entrepreneur Blog

Guy Kawasaki

Alltop

The Daily Motivator

Chief Executive

Politics

Portal Of Business Links

Comments (View)

Are Request for Proposals a waste of time?

There is a rising trend in the market research field that is raising concern among full-service market research and polling companies. Specifically, prospective clients are reaching out more and more for bids on projects.


Initially this may seem like a good thing, and possibly an indicator that the economy is picking up. Sadly, this is not the case at all.


More and more firms are reporting losing bids, and the most common reason offered: “we decided to work with a company that is already familiar with us, and/or, that we have worked with before.”


After attending an industry event recently, in an impromptu gathering afterward of the heads of well-known MR firms, the reaction to this situation was simple; they never intended to use anyone else, they just wanted to drive down the rates of the incumbent.


As for solutions, a number of things were discussed that ranged from charging for proposals to some sort of collective ratemaking. As for the latter, yes, there could be antitrust issues.


Is driving down the rates of an incumbent vendor something new? Absolutely not. Due to the current economic disaster though, more and more customers are being forced to get 3 to 5 bids to satisfy “C” level management, even if this means giving the incumbent a heads-up and “last look” so that they ultimately do retain the business. 


This is a hot topic among captains of the market research field, and I expect that we will be seeing some major changes over the next few months. 


Considering it typically takes anywhere from 20-30 man-hours to assemble a proposal, what do you think of charging to offer a proposal, with the caveat that if accepted, the proposal cost will be deducted from the actual project?
Are Request for Proposals a waste of time?

There is a rising trend in the market research field that is raising concern among full-service market research and polling companies. Specifically, prospective clients are reaching out more and more for bids on projects.

Initially this may seem like a good thing, and possibly an indicator that the economy is picking up. Sadly, this is not the case at all.

More and more firms are reporting losing bids, and the most common reason offered: “we decided to work with a company that is already familiar with us, and/or, that we have worked with before.”

After attending an industry event recently, in an impromptu gathering afterward of the heads of well-known MR firms, the reaction to this situation was simple; they never intended to use anyone else, they just wanted to drive down the rates of the incumbent.

As for solutions, a number of things were discussed that ranged from charging for proposals to some sort of collective ratemaking. As for the latter, yes, there could be antitrust issues.

Is driving down the rates of an incumbent vendor something new? Absolutely not. Due to the current economic disaster though, more and more customers are being forced to get 3 to 5 bids to satisfy “C” level management, even if this means giving the incumbent a heads-up and “last look” so that they ultimately do retain the business.

This is a hot topic among captains of the market research field, and I expect that we will be seeing some major changes over the next few months.

Considering it typically takes anywhere from 20-30 man-hours to assemble a proposal, what do you think of charging to offer a proposal, with the caveat that if accepted, the proposal cost will be deducted from the actual project?

Comments (View)
Comments (View)

Small business poll shows gloomy outlook

On June 15, 2009 the Small Business Administration unveiled the much anticipated “ARC” (American Recovery Capital Loan Program) to reportedly help small business during the current recession. This program is intended to offer up to a maximum of $35,000 to qualified small businesses facing immediate hardship.

We conducted a nationwide survey of SBA authorized lenders as well as small businesses. Below are some highlights from this research.

  • 81% of the approved SBA lenders advised that they were not currently participating in the ARC program, and had no date as to if, and when they might.
  • Of the 19% who said that they were taking part in this program, 96% told us that they had little understanding of the program, and/or support from the SBA on how to properly process the requested loans.
  • 100% of the participating ARC lenders advise that there is a major conflict as to whose forms (SBA or bank) should be used for the application.
  • Of those banks actively participating in the ARC program, 96% admit that they are doing so reluctantly.
  • 89% of reporting small businesses advise that they are confused about the ARC program and have been unable to get intelligible information from the SBA or lenders.
  • The majority of those responding advise that they were overwhelmed with the paperwork requirements of the ARC loan and that it would cost them money for a CPA or accountant to help them prepare the loan request.
  • When asked about the state of their business, 68% of small businesses admitted they were “hanging on by a thread.”
  • 82% of participating small businesses advise that they have no confidence that President Obama and/or Congress will deliver meaningful relief to small firms.
  • Regarding hiring, 78% of small businesses responded that they have cut their plans to hire additional staff and will rely on independent contractors as-needed.
  • 56% of the small companies who responded have laid off employees, and of those, 48% plan to lay-off more staff within the next 30 days.
  • 55% of the polled firms advise that they may be forced to file for bankruptcy within the next 30-60 days.

We had hoped for better results!

Comments (View)
Comments (View)
Comments (View)

Measuring the customer experience

More and more retailers are abandoning market research initiatives that measure and grade the customer experience.

Simultaneously, retail sales continue to plummet. Is there a correlation? Of course there is.

While it is easy, and in many cases correct to blame the economy, in this situation, retailers have to fight harder and harder to attract and maintain customers.

Sadly, there is a trend among some retailers to use DIY (Do It Yourself) survey tools. As I have written before, the “tool” is not necessarily the problem, it is the survey itself.

Would you ask your brother the real estate mogul to perform your heart bypass surgery? Of course not! Then why would you demand that your marketing department become market research professionals with no formal training or experience. After all, we are talking about your financial bottom line here.

If you do not take the time to properly listen to your customers, why should they purchase goods from you?

Comments (View)

In this video Scott talks about the Return on Investment (ROI) from conducting good market research.

Now more than ever, intuition alone is not enough to risk capital (human or financial) on.

Comments (View)
Comments (View)
Comments (View)

What is the current hot trends in market research today?

I use this video to talk about employee attitude surveys, and customer perception studies.

Comments (View)

In this video, I disucss the 3 critical components (WIIFM, Business Goals, and Survey Data Outcome) of successful market research, especially as it relates to web surveys.

Comments (View)
Comments (View)

We are providing this insight related to the current state of the market research field, and most specifically; web-based surveys.

Powerfeedback is also making a very special, and limited time offer to help those considering launching a web-based survey.

Comments (View)
Comments (View)